Muzej Domovinskog rata
| Srđ ulica 2, Dubrovnik |
5 oranları
8.00/10.00 |
Muzej Domovinskog rata haritada
değerlendirme
Paolo Barracano (10.10.2017 08:56)
Very nice
Very nice
William Girgis (25.07.2017 08:55)
Historical site with a lot of informations about the defending a City of Dubrovnik from the period of 1991 to 1995. When you enter the museum, you have a stairway to the roof top with a nice view of the old city from it.
Historical site with a lot of informations about the defending a City of Dubrovnik from the period of 1991 to 1995. When you enter the museum, you have a stairway to the roof top with a nice view of the old city from it.
Dorian Kraševec Miljas (30.12.2016 09:46)
A great and authentic museum about the war in the southern Croatia and about the defence of Dubrovnik. A lot of photographs and videos from the period which paint the situation of civilians and "ordinary" people caught in the war. But as other reviews say, it is good if you come with some knowledge about the context of the war
A great and authentic museum about the war in the southern Croatia and about the defence of Dubrovnik. A lot of photographs and videos from the period which paint the situation of civilians and "ordinary" people caught in the war. But as other reviews say, it is good if you come with some knowledge about the context of the war
Philip Pietrangelo (14.08.2016 15:01)
Decent, but most of the exhibit was photographs from the war period. Interesting and educational, but I felt like I could get the same experience on the internet. A lot of the information was redundant.
Decent, but most of the exhibit was photographs from the war period. Interesting and educational, but I felt like I could get the same experience on the internet. A lot of the information was redundant.
Edward Snorton (28.06.2016 23:28)
Pro: detailed chronologically reconstruction of every single attack (incl. names of squad leaders)
Con: no context around the war itself, focusing on victim role, poor English translation, descriptions full of irrelevant information (eg name of the guy who started building defenses in 1991)
Pro: detailed chronologically reconstruction of every single attack (incl. names of squad leaders)
Con: no context around the war itself, focusing on victim role, poor English translation, descriptions full of irrelevant information (eg name of the guy who started building defenses in 1991)
